Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Grid Modernization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Energy Strategy hearing focuses on grid modernization, interconnection and allowing utilities to generate
Summary
A legislative listening session on the State Energy Strategy centered on grid resilience, interconnection rules, who pays for upgrades and a proposal to allow local utilities to own generation; the Department extended written public comments through Sept. 2.
State lawmakers and agency staff met in a public listening session to gather input for the next iteration of the State Energy Strategy, centering discussion on grid modernization, interconnection fairness and whether local utilities should be allowed to own generation inside the state.
The session, convened by committee leadership and staff, was described by a department staff member as "designed to hear from you and get your input" on topics ranging from format and content to technical policy options; the staff member also said the written public comment period has been extended "through September 2, just after Labor Day." The meeting produced no formal votes or policy adoptions.
Why it matters: Committee members said New Hampshire faces near-term questions about resilience, rising electricity demand, and who ultimately bears the cost of grid upgrades. Those issues affect ratepayers, local businesses and prospective large electricity users such as data centers.
Most lawmakers urged the strategy to prioritize actions the state can control. "I would hope that the plan could really focus on what are we the masters of—what we can do that we can actually accomplish no matter what happens in these other policy realms," said Senator Waters, who urged the plan to treat resilience, distributed resources and grid modernization as linked priorities. Waters repeatedly pressed for clearer mechanisms on interconnection cost allocation and on protecting local ratepayers if large users trigger system upgrades.
Several legislators and staff discussed interconnection rulemaking now under development. Department staff said rule sets called EN 900 (for smaller interconnections) and EN 1000 (for larger interconnections) are underway and will be presented to the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules (JLCAR) in accordance with statutory deadlines. Staff described the central dispute as "who pays for what," noting disagreement among stakeholders over models, timelines and cost allocation for necessary upgrades.
A line of questioning focused on whether the state should allow incumbent utilities to build and own generation within New Hampshire. One legislator said they are "seriously looking at allowing the utilities to have their own generation in the state" and asked for feedback on potential benefits and downsides; staff and other lawmakers cautioned the committee that permitting utility-owned generation raises complex issues involving wholesale markets, regional grid operation and legal jurisdiction.
Policy timing and technology horizons were also discussed. Lawmakers noted that small modular nuclear is broadly expected to be a roughly 10-year prospect while offshore wind projects discussed in the region are about seven to eight years from significant contribution. Staff and senators said those timelines should guide realistic planning assumptions in the 10-year strategy.
Energy efficiency and the statutory cost-effectiveness test drew attention. Department staff described the Granite State Test as written in statute and summarized it as a dollar-for-dollar requirement: "for every energy efficiency measure that you take, there must be at least $1 worth of savings." Lawmakers urged the strategy to include concrete, implementable efficiency targets tied to likely funding and delivery mechanisms.
Other topics raised included storage and distributed energy resources (including bidirectional electric vehicle capabilities and microgrids) as tools for resilience; metering and smart-meter policy; the potential for waste-to-energy and food-waste anaerobic digestion; concerns about large new gas pipeline buildouts and who would pay for them; and the importance of affordability for residential ratepayers.
The Department asked committee members for written feedback and reaffirmed the open comment period. No formal committee direction, motions or votes were recorded during the session. Staff noted they will provide additional updates, including the six-month interconnection rule reports and the draft rule submissions to JLCAR.
