Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Public Service, staff and interveners debate how many and which scenarios should guide Phase 2 modeling
Summary
Parties at the Colorado Public Utilities Commission hearing disputed how many and which portfolio scenarios the company should model to guide the JTS Phase 2 decision, with the company proposing a set of materially different portfolios and staff proposing alternate parameters to capture ownership, tariff and gas-resource outcomes.
Public Service Company of Colorado and multiple interveners debated how the commission should structure Phase 2 modeling to produce portfolios for the Just Transition Solicitation (JTS), with disagreement centered on how many scenarios to run and which policy variables they should reflect.
The companies, staff and trade interveners told the Public Utilities Commission at the evidentiary hearing that Phase 2 modeling must balance creating materially different portfolios, and keeping the evaluation work feasible. Public Service increased its proposed scenario set from eight to 14 in rebuttal; staff then proposed its own set of scenarios intended to cover a different range of policy outcomes, including…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
