Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Home Occupations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committee sends home‑occupation zoning changes, including accessory‑building use and temporary signage, to council for review
Summary
Planning and zoning and rules committee members debated proposed language to allow home occupations in accessory buildings and to clarify temporary signage rules; the committee voted to send the consolidated draft to council and noted a public hearing must be held before an ordinance is adopted.
Committee discussion at Monday’s meeting focused on a planned consolidation of the village code sections governing home occupations and temporary signage. The current draft removes language that restricted certain accessory structures from hosting home‑based businesses and adds provisions intended to clarify whether signage is permitted for home occupations.
A staff member said the draft consolidates several scattered code sections into a single home‑occupation section. The planning group that reviewed the draft recommended removing restrictive language that had forbidden using barns and sheds for home occupations, which, if adopted, would allow accessory buildings to house certain home businesses subject to other standards.
Council members debated how signs for home occupations should be treated. Under the draft, temporary signs—such as yard sale or political signs—remain governed by the village’s temporary‑sign rules and would not be permitted year‑round; the draft also proposes limiting permanent or semi‑permanent signage for home occupations to small, clearly defined formats. Several councilmembers said they wanted the public hearing process to include signage discussion and requested the zoning commission and staff provide examples and recommended limits before final council action.
The council committee moved to send the consolidated home‑occupation/sign code to council for review and instructed staff to schedule a public hearing on the ordinance. Members noted the zoning board and planning staff can still propose technical tweaks and that council has the authority to amend the ordinance during the legislative process.
No ordinance was adopted at the meeting; the item will return to council with the public‑hearing record and any recommended amendments.
