Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Golf Manor Council debates who must get background checks for volunteers and commissioners
Summary
Council members and staff discussed scope, timing and cost of a proposed background-check policy for commissioners, committee members and volunteers, and agreed to form a small working group to refine who is covered and how checks will be paid for and administered.
Golf Manor Village council members on Thursday discussed revisions to the village’s background-check policy, focusing on who should be required to undergo checks, how the checks would be interpreted and who would pay for additional screening.
The village administrator (name not specified) said the main question was “who does it apply to?” and noted both commission members and volunteers have raised concerns about unclear scope and inconsistent application. The administrator said the existing draft suggested checks for anyone working with children and that the solicitor had suggested adding anyone handling money, but council members did not resolve those points during the meeting.
Council members and staff agreed the policy needs clearer definitions of who is subject to screening (commissions, committees, volunteers, event staff), what exclusions apply and who interprets results. The administrator asked for two volunteers to review scenarios and return a proposed policy; later in the meeting the administrator said she would “take a stab at tweaking it” and bring a revised draft to a future meeting.
Reed (staff member) described the locally available checks and timing: “I can get the information’s name in 10 seconds,” he said when asked how long RCIC and NCIC queries take. The draft policy in the packet instructs initial checks to be run by the police department through RCIC and NCIC; it states that if additional screening is required the applicant will be referred elsewhere and the applicant would bear the cost of that extra screening.
Council members raised operational questions about volunteers who show up for events on short notice and whether free checks run by the police would be fast enough for same-day verification. Members also noted the policy treats volunteer applications differently from committee or commission members and said the distinction needs to be spelled out.
Rather than vote on the policy, the council tabled final action and agreed to have the administrator and two volunteers refine the document and return a clearer proposal to an upcoming meeting. The meeting did not set a firm date for final adoption.
