Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Telecom Tax Exemption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears bill to update wireless equipment sales-tax exemption to cover internet access

3748886 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A hearing on House Bill 1503 centered on clarifying Pennsylvania’s sales and use tax exemption for equipment used in wireless networks so it expressly covers Internet access; sponsor Representative Prokopiak and industry witness Scott Mackey said the change provides certainty for investment and would align Pennsylvania with neighboring states.

Representative Prokopiak introduced House Bill 1503, a proposal to clarify that Pennsylvania’s existing sales and use tax exemption for machinery and equipment used to provide mobile telephone service also covers equipment used to provide Internet access, saying the change would preserve competitiveness and support network investment.

“Pennsylvania needs to have that as well,” Representative Prokopiak told the committee, urging the legislature to modernize a tax code provision more than two decades old so companies investing in telecommunication networks have certainty on tax treatment. He cited Pew Research data during his remarks to underline widespread smartphone use.

Scott Mackey of Leonine Public Affairs testified online on behalf of AT&T, Verizon, T‑Mobile and the wireless industry trade association in support of the bill. Mackey told the committee the exemption originally targeted equipment used for voice services but that the same equipment now also provides Internet access, and the clarifying language would prevent future disputes as technology evolves. “It would simply eliminate any future uncertainty about the applicability of the ability of the existing exemption, as the technology changes,” he said.

Both sponsor and industry witnesses framed the bill as pro‑investment and pro‑consumer: they argued clearer tax treatment will reduce uncertainty for companies that must invest billions to upgrade networks and could spur competition that benefits consumers.

Committee members asked no substantive follow-up questions of the witness; Representative Prokopiak said he intends to bring the bill to a committee voting meeting scheduled the next day at 12:00 p.m., and he set an amendment deadline accordingly.

No fiscal estimate or formal committee action appears in the transcript; the hearing record shows support from major wireless carriers and the sponsor and places the bill on the committee’s next voting agenda.