Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Materials Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oregon legislature passes bill to limit book removals from school libraries
Summary
The Oregon House passed Senate Bill 10 98, a measure lawmakers described as protecting access to educational materials and prohibiting removal of books for discriminatory reasons while preserving review for age-appropriateness; the bill drew extended debate and passed by constitutional majority.
The Oregon House passed Senate Bill 10 98 on final reading after more than an hour of debate, approving a measure lawmakers and supporters described as protecting students’ access to school library materials from removals motivated by discrimination.
Senate Bill 10 98 requires that challenges to school materials not be based on protected characteristics and preserves ordinary review for age-appropriateness, obscenity, and educational value, sponsors said.
Sponsor Representative J. Nelson, who spoke in support on the floor, framed the bill as “celebrating the freedom to read” and said it “does not mandate what materials are being presented” but “does not allow material to be banned within the protected criteria.” He also said the bill would not stop administrators from considering “age appropriateness, obscenity, and educational value.”
Opponents argued the bill duplicates existing law and risks limiting local control. Representative K. Hudson and other critics said current anti-discrimination statutes already prohibit discriminatory treatment in schools and voiced concern the bill could tie the hands of school boards and parents. Representative Juncker called it a “Trojan horse” that could impede removal of materials some parents consider age-inappropriate.
Supporters, including teachers and librarians who spoke or whose testimony was read into the record, said the measure fills a statutory gap by providing a clear process for challenges and preventing removal based on the identity of authors or the subjects they address. Representative Hudson cited ORS 659.850 and said federal statutes and state education rules do not by themselves prevent discriminatory removals of educational materials.
The bill sets a process for challenges: a challenge must come from a parent, guardian or school employee, a local committee must consider the request and provide a public written explanation before removal, and removals remain possible on grounds such as age-appropriateness or obscenity. Representative Hudson summarized the committee process on the floor: a committee considers the request, ensures compliance with the bill’s standards, and provides a public written explanation before removal.
After debate the clerk opened the voting system and, with the required constitutional majority recorded, the presiding officer declared Senate Bill 10 98 passed.
Votes at final reading were not printed in full in the transcript excerpt; the clerk and presiding officer announced the bill had received the constitutional majority and was declared passed.
