Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Conduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances changes to athletic code and student conduct reading; adds probation week, clarifies discipline levels
Summary
A committee-recommended update to the district code of conduct would add a one-week probation window for academic eligibility and clarify four-level discipline categories that determine penalties such as community service or season suspensions; the board approved the reading.
A district committee presented recommended changes to the Galesburg CUSD 205 code of conduct and athletic eligibility during the board meeting, and the board advanced the item as a reading.
A committee representative explained the biggest change on the academic side is an added probationary week at the beginning of an ineligibility period. Under the proposed language, a student who is failing a class would enter a one-week probationary period during which staff and coaches may arrange interventions; if the student remains ineligible after that week, academic ineligibility would begin. The committee emphasized the district would remain above the Illinois High School Association (IHSA) minimum eligibility standard.
The committee also proposed that students with three or more F grades be immediately ineligible and not eligible for the probationary period. Discipline categories were reorganized into levels 1–4: lower-level violations would carry restorative responses such as community service and apologies to affected teams; higher-level violations (levels 3–4) would trigger suspensions from participation — typically a 25% loss of the season for certain offenses such as drug use, depending on severity.
Board members asked about how marijuana possession and vaping are categorized. The committee said nicotine e-cigarette possession is listed at a mid-level category while marijuana possession or distribution could be classified at a higher level depending on facts; level 3/4 drug use would generally trigger the 25% season suspension rather than only community service. Committee members said only a small number of students were processed under the athletic code this year — the committee cited about four athletic-code violations in the current year — and that coaches who attended the committee meeting generally supported the split approach.
The board took the recommended reading under consideration and approved it as read; the action moves the policy toward final adoption at a subsequent meeting after legal review and any further edits.
