Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Alabama Supreme Court hears dispute over mailed notice for Birmingham subdivision plat
Summary
At oral argument, justices questioned whether the City of Birmingham Planning Commission’s approval of a 2020 subdivision plat must be invalidated because adjoining owner 790 Montclair LLC did not receive mailed notice; counsel split over whether precedent requires strict mailed notice and whether any concrete injury occurred.
The Supreme Court of Alabama on Tuesday heard argument over whether the City of Birmingham Planning Commission’s approval of a subdivision plat in November 2020 must be invalidated because an adjoining landowner, 790 Montclair LLC, was not mailed notice of the hearing.
The question matters because, counsel for the appellant argued, state precedent requires strict compliance with mandatory notice provisions and the failure to mail notice to adjoining landowners renders the planning commission’s action invalid regardless of whether the landowner showed prejudice. Appellees countered that subdivision regulations differ from zoning rules honored in precedent and that the record does not show a cognizable injury that would warrant undoing an approved and recorded plat.
Diane Maughn, counsel for appellant Montclair LLC, told the court: "Following this court's precedent, the answer to that question is undeniably yes, and the approval of the subdivision plat is due to be invalidated." Maughn said Jefferson County tax-assessor records show 790…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

