Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hearing Postponed topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flores v. Santa Cruz hearing postponed after parent/guardian fails to appear
Summary
A hearing in GND-?? (Flores v. Santa Cruz Landscaping) was postponed because the parent or guardian required for a minor settlement proof-up was not present; parties were instructed to reset the matter through court administration.
The court postponed the Flores v. Santa Cruz Landscaping matter on June 9, 2025, after the guardian/parent required for a minor settlement proof-up could not be located on the remote call.
Judge Amy Clark Meacham said the case could not proceed without the parent or guardian present. Counsel for the parties reported they had been unable to reach the parent and that the phone was going to voicemail. The judge allowed the parties time to attempt to locate the guardian and then directed that the matter be reset through court administration if the guardian could not be found.
Ruben Rios appeared for Synod Santa Cruz Landscaping and Ben Kittlegrad appeared for the plaintiff. The court did not hear testimony or make a final ruling on the merits because the necessary witness — the parent/guardian — was absent. The judge instructed counsel to coordinate with court administration to reset the hearing if the guardian could not be reached within the brief waiting period.
