Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Paid Family Leave topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears details on governor's proposal to fully supplement state employees' family leave pay

3720402 · June 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators questioned the Department of Labor about a $10 million budget appropriation to provide full pay (100%) to state employees on bonding leave; the department said the appropriation is projected and budget language authorizes additional appropriations if needed.

The Senate Labor Committee examined a governor's budget proposal that would fund a supplemental payment so state employees on bonding leave receive full salary rather than the current 85% benefit.

Senator (questioning) asked why the budget includes a $10,000,000 appropriation and whether additional appropriations might be necessary. Assistant Commissioner (budget question response) told the committee that the $10 million figure is based on projections that estimate how many state employees take bonding leave and the difference between 85% and full salary; the budget includes standard language authorizing additional appropriations to avoid prematurely exhausting the line item.

The department clarified that the proposed supplemental payment applies only to state employees as an employer-provided supplement for bonding leave. "It's basically like an incentive for our employees. This isn't a policy to this wise in the budget — it's acting as an employer," the commissioner said, describing the program as a finite, targeted benefit for bonding leave rather than a universal change to paid family policy.

Senators raised concerns that moving from 85% to 100% pay could disincentivize return-to-work timing and asked for program cost projections. The department said its projection methodology was developed with the Office of Management and Budget and is based on historic leave-taking patterns; it committed to supplying follow-up materials and analysis through the committee.

No formal action or vote was taken during the hearing; senators asked the department to provide additional cost spreadsheets and to clarify statutory implications before the budget process advances.