Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel backs study of veterans court programs and post-conviction mentor program
Summary
The committee reported favorably on a resolution to have the Special Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs review two veterans programs — the Veterans Court Program Treatment Act and the Post-Conviction Veterans Mentor Program — with the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs urging the study because of program successes and funding gaps.
The Louisiana House Judiciary Committee reported favorably on House Resolution 247 by Representative Cruz, which authorizes the Special Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs to study the Veterans Court Program Treatment Act and the Post-Conviction Veterans Mentor Program to determine whether statutory or programmatic changes are needed.
Representative Jason Cruz introduced the measure and invited Charlton McGinley, identified in committee testimony as the secretary of the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs, to describe veterans courts. McGinley said, "Veteran courts provide an incredible resource for our veterans" and described them as an "adult diversion" model aimed at treatment and reducing recidivism among veterans. He noted there are programs in several judicial districts and said one JDC program "has actually become a national model," adding that recidivism among graduates is "very, very low."
McGinley and other supporters told the committee the primary challenges are funding and sustained support, including buy-in from district attorneys, public defenders, mentors and judges. Committee members expressed support; Representative Dickerson said she had "seen firsthand how it's worked and been successful" and moved the resolution favorably. The motion to move favorably carried with no objection recorded in committee.
The resolution directs a study by the Special Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs; it does not itself allocate funding or change program statutes. Committee testimony emphasized program success at local sites and that lack of funding and formal supports limit program expansion.
