Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents complain of overflowing transfer sites; board adopts expanded elderly/disabled solid-waste fee relief
Summary
Residents reported repeatedly full bins at Sedley and Jonas Bridge Road transfer sites and urged more frequent collection. Separately the board adopted an ordinance raising income thresholds for elderly/disabled exemptions to the solid-waste management fee and aligning exemption brackets with inflation.
Several residents told the Board during the citizen-comment period that Southampton County's transfer sites — notably Sedley and Jonas Bridge Road — are frequently full, forcing trips to other sites or leaving some recyclables uncollected.
Why it matters: overflowing bins present a nuisance and potential health issue for users of county transfer stations and indicate capacity or collection-schedule problems in county solid-waste operations.
Resident Ash Cutchen said bins at the Sedley and Jonas Bridge Road sites are often full "4 or 5 feet above the top" and that recyclables are regularly left uncollected, which has forced him on multiple occasions to take recyclables home or place them in general trash. "We need to improve the service at least those 2 solid waste sites," Cutchen said.
County staff and the county administrator reported that public-works and solid-waste staff are reviewing shelter and driveway improvements at sites and will examine collection schedules; the administrator also noted that staff will inspect sites and pursue upgrades and additional driveway entrance work over the next fiscal year.
Meanwhile, the Board adopted an ordinance amending the county's tax-relief and fee-exemption tables for the elderly and disabled. The change raises the household income threshold used to determine exemptions to $45,000 and adjusts sliding-scale exemption brackets (100% exemption now at $28,099 and reduced exemptions in higher bands) to reflect inflation. The board adopted both the tax-relief ordinance and the solid-waste fee relief ordinance, which were intentionally revised together so both programs use the same income thresholds.
Ending: County staff said they will review transfer-site operations and collection frequency and report back with a plan; residents with specific site problems were encouraged to provide details so public works can prioritize repairs and collection adjustments.
