Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Code Update topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Campton Hills moves to adopt newer state building codes; trustees ask for permit‑fee and permit‑scope review

3702666 · June 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Village staff and the board discussed updating local building-code amendments to a more recent edition to meet state requirements and debated which repairs and replacements should require permits; trustees asked staff to present a detailed list of permit triggers and fee comparisons at the July meeting.

The Village Board heard a presentation from the village’s fire‑safety consultant and staff proposing to adopt a newer edition of the state building codes and to update local amendments.

Presenter Seth (fire safety consultant) told trustees that the state requires municipalities to adopt at least the 2018 edition of the model building codes and that Campton Hills is currently on the 2012 edition. He said updating to a later edition incorporates more recent construction, energy, snow-load and wind data, and new provisions for technologies such as home battery storage and rooftop solar. Seth emphasized that many amendments currently practiced by the village were not codified and the update would both align the written code with existing village practice and improve clarity for designers, builders and property owners.

Trustees raised questions about the scope of required permits under the revised code—examples included window and front‑door replacements, furnace and water‑heater swaps, and other repair vs. replacement distinctions. The board discussed the balance between public safety/energy standards and the practical burden on residents and contractors. Several trustees asked staff to prepare a clear list of what would and would not require a permit under the updated code and to bring a comparison of neighboring jurisdictions’ permit practices and fee schedules.

Staff agreed to provide a draft permit‑scope list and comparative fee data and to place that topic on the July meeting agenda so trustees can resolve outstanding questions before formal code adoption. Staff also suggested an outreach plan to explain changes to residents and contractors if the board moves forward with adoption.