Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prince William County School Board upholds three dismissals and approves appointments after closed-session review
Summary
The Prince William County School Board approved appointments and releases of employees and unanimously upheld the superintendent’s dismissal recommendations in three separate employee cases (T25-002, T25-003, T25-004) after a closed session called under Virginia open-meeting exemptions.
School Board member Jen Wall moved and the board approved a set of personnel actions following a closed session called under Virginia law, including appointments and releases of specific employees and the formal upholding of the superintendent’s recommended dismissals in three employee cases.
The board voted to approve appointments and releases as presented in closed session. That motion passed with five yes votes, two abstentions and one member not present at the vote. Later, the board heard and voted on three employee cases. In separate motions, School Board member Jen Wall moved that the board uphold the superintendent’s recommendation of dismissal in employee case T25-002; the board voted in favor with no opposition. The board then moved and unanimously upheld the superintendent’s recommendations in employee cases T25-003 and T25-004. Each of those dismissal motions authorized the chairman at large to provide a written decision to the affected employee reflecting the board’s action.
The motions to enter and to certify the closed session cited the statutory exemptions in the Code of Virginia invoked by the board. The board’s motion to enter closed session referenced Virginia Code § 2.2‑3711 and § 2.2‑3712 and specified personnel matters (appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salary or resignation of specific employees), grievance appeals (employee case numbers T25‑002, T25‑003 and T25‑004), consultation with counsel on probable litigation and legal implications of a development proffer related to a county rezoning application, and security‑related briefings that would be jeopardized by public discussion.
Board members noted there was no public discussion of the personnel details in open session beyond the formal motions and vote tallies. The record shows the board followed the formal certification procedure on returning to open session, adopting a certification resolution stating that only lawfully exempted public business was discussed and that discussion was limited to matters identified in the motion to convene the closed meeting.
The board’s formal actions are reflected on the meeting record; no further personnel details were disclosed in open session.
Ending
The board moved from personnel action items into the meeting’s public agenda items, beginning with the Pledge of Allegiance and the Thriving Futures recognitions segment. The superintendent and board chair indicated that written notices reflecting the board’s decisions would be issued to the employees referenced in the dismissal motions.
