Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works Bids topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burke County opens competitive bids for library HVAC and multiple recreation-court projects
Summary
County staff opened and read multiple bids for a library HVAC replacement and for construction of new basketball, tennis and football courts; staff reported large variation in bids and noted that adding lights raised several vendors' prices by roughly $40,000.
At a Burke County Commission meeting staff opened competitive bids for a library HVAC replacement and for several recreation projects, including basketball courts, tennis courts and a football field.
County staff read the bids aloud during the bid-opening portion of the meeting and summarized that the apparent low bid for the library HVAC replacement was about $47,000 from a bidder identified in the record as "C B Y." For the recreation projects, staff reported multiple bids across vendors and surfaces with amounts and optional add-ons that produced wide price variation. Staff said adding lighting typically increased bids by about $40,000.
Examples read into the record by county staff included: a bid reported for one court option near $137,000 (no lights) with an option adding lights rising to about $158,000; another vendor's base bid near $163,000 with lights adding roughly $42,000; one submitted tennis bid of about $203,000; and other bids ranging into the mid-$400,000s and, in one listing, as high as $702,000 depending on surface type and scope. Staff emphasized differences in surface materials (for example, asphalt on quartz vs. surface systems with concrete perimeter work) as drivers of cost differences.
Staff said fences and other specified items were included in the bids described. Commissioners asked questions about vendor experience, whether a low bid might reflect lower-quality work or later change orders, and whether fences and lighting were included; staff responded that fences were included in the listed bids and that some vendors specialized in court construction and therefore bid lower.
No contract awards or formal procurement decisions were made during the meeting; the session record shows only the public reading of bids for later evaluation and recommendation.
