Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fence Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Downers Grove Township petitioner seeks 8-foot rear fence for privacy; hearing officer intends to recommend approval

3689873 ยท June 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Downers Grove Township resident requested an 8-foot rear-yard fence where 6.6 feet is permitted, citing lack of privacy and safety concerns; the hearing officer said there were no objections and intends to recommend approval at the June 18 recommendation meeting.

A petitioner in Downers Grove Township asked DuPage County zoning authorities on May 20 for a variation to allow an approximately 8-foot fence in a rear yard where the permitted height is 6.6 feet. The petition (case 25031) applies to a 0.24-acre lot served by water and sewer, and the hearing officer said notices were sent and he had received no objections from notified entities.

The petitioner, identified in the record as Kim Blaucheck (petitioner), said side fences would remain at the standard 6 feet but she requested an 8-foot fence along the rear to restore privacy. She described yard topography that leaves the backyard visible from the sidewalk and told the hearing officer, "We have 0 privacy. We have more of a slope than our neighbors...right when the fence starts, the yard on the other side slopes upward to get to the sidewalk, so we have 0 privacy." She also raised safety concerns, saying passersby sometimes make comments to children playing in the backyard.

The hearing officer noted exhibits including a survey, a site plan, and photographs. He told the petitioner he had sufficient information to make a decision and said his intention was to recommend approval; he directed that the case will be considered at the recommendation meeting on June 18 at 3:00 p.m., and then will proceed to the county development committee and full county board if recommended.

No formal vote occurred during the May 20 hearing and no final decision was announced.