Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Asset Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Freestone County reviews draft asset disposition policy; staff and commissioners to follow up

3689553 · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed a draft Freestone County asset disposition policy that would assign finance and IT responsibility for retiring, selling or disposing county assets; no formal action was taken and the item will return for further discussion.

Freestone County commissioners reviewed a draft asset disposition policy that, as written, would assign primary responsibility to the county finance and information technology departments and set procedures for removing county assets from active use.

The policy, introduced as agenda Item 13, defines an asset as "any item owned by the county with a useful life of more than 1 year" and lists disposal methods including reuse, sale, donation, recycling or destruction. The presenting speaker noted that "there are various statutes that tell you how you can do those things, and we'll have to follow those, of course."

The court discussed the scope of property covered. One participant asked whether culverts and other materials removed during road work were included and whether prior bid agreements (referenced as a past procurement in Fairfield) remain in effect. Another speaker read the policy scope aloud, saying it would cover "office equipment, whether it be furniture, printers, computers, network gear, vehicles, and machine." The meeting transcript recorded clarification requests but no vote on the policy during this session.

No formal action or adoption was recorded. Commissioners indicated they would continue reviewing the draft and return the item to a future agenda for further consideration and possible formal approval. The court also moved a separate agenda item to table and reschedule a timekeeping services presentation to a later meeting.

The transcript notes that statutory requirements govern disposal of county property; the draft policy does not change those legal obligations and references compliance with applicable statutes.