Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Lcap topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Ysidro trustees hear LCAP update and a proposed 2025-26 budget that relies on one-time state funds

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented the Local Control and Accountability Plan update and a proposed 2025-26 budget showing roughly $76.8 million in projected revenue and $76.6 million in expenditures, and warned trustees of state and federal funding risks.

District staff presented the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) annual update and the proposed 2025-26 budget at the San Ysidro School District board meeting on June 5, telling trustees that recent state and federal budget projections pose risks to next yearfinances.

Why it matters: Staff said the districtrelies on state LCFF funding for roughly 76% of revenues and is using a portion of a one-time discretionary block grant in the proposed budget; presenters warned that the governor's May revision projects a large state shortfall that could reduce future education funding.

What presenters said: "What is the LCAP? Each school district shall adopt a research based LCAP using a template adopted by the state," the district's coordinator of federal and state programs said during the presentation, citing Education Code 52060. The update summarized LCAP priorities: academic achievement (ELA and math), English learner progress, school climate and parent engagement. Staff noted local measures such as CAASPP practice tests, the ELPAC and district benchmarks; they highlighted interventions, dual-language programs and professional development.

Budget highlights and risks: Marilyn, the district's business director, presented the proposed general-fund figures: projected 2025-26 revenues of about $76.8 million and projected expenditures of about $76.6 million, with salary and benefits accounting for roughly 78% of spending. Staff said special-education costs were budgeted near $15.1 million and that LCFF comprises about 76% of revenue.

District staff warned that the governor's May revision projected a state-level shortfall and cited a potential decline in Proposition 98 support; the presentation included a projection that a full state-level shortfall could translate to about a $3 million hit to the district if the May revision is enacted. Staff also noted federal-level uncertainty, saying some U.S. Department of Education programs in the White House proposal face proposed cuts, though Title I and IDEA were shown in the presentation as maintained in the governor's budget assumptions.

Free-meal program note: Staff reminded trustees the district participates in the Community Eligibility Provision so all students currently receive free meals; presenters said a loss of federal or state support for meal reimbursement would force a return to meal applications and could carry substantial cost and logistical consequences.

Board action during hearing: Trustees unanimously moved to open and close the public hearings on the LCAP and on the proposed budget (each motion passed 5-0). The presentations were informational; the record does not show a final adoption vote on the budget at that meeting.

Next steps: Staff said they will continue to refine the budget as state and federal proposals evolve and will present required budget items at interim reporting dates; staff and trustees discussed possible additional public engagement and monitoring of restricted funds and attendance-recovery investments.

Ending note: The presentation highlighted district priorities funded in 2024-25 and proposed to continue in 2025-26, including dual-language instruction, multi-tiered social-emotional supports and targeted intervention programs, while warning trustees that the district's financial position depends on one-time state funds and on volatile statewide revenue assumptions.