Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Inspection Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasco staff propose removing permits for small fences, sheds and reroofs to reduce regulatory burden
Summary
City staff recommended code changes to exempt certain small‑scale work (decks, small storage sheds, fences, reroofing that does not affect structural sheathing) from separate permits where the International Building and Residential Codes do not require them; council generally supported direction to draft code revisions and return for action.
City staff presented a proposal to the Pasco City Council workshop to remove permit requirements for minor residential work that the International Building Code and International Residential Code exempt, aiming to reduce customer cost and free staff time.
Director Miller (building/permitting lead) told council that Pasco currently requires permits for some small projects that are not required under the model international codes and that exemptions (for example, decks, small storage sheds and fences) would save residents both time and money and free permitting staff for larger code‑required work. Miller said staff would provide educational materials and limited planner assistance so homeowners could place fences and sheds correctly and avoid easement or property‑line conflicts.
Deputy City Manager Sigdell and Director Miller clarified that certain work would still require permits: any work in the public right‑of‑way (driveway cuts, sidewalks) must have a right‑of‑way permit, and work that affects structural components (for example, removing roof sheathing or altering structural members) would continue to require plan review and inspection. On reroofing the staff said replacing roofing materials or shingles alone would be proposed for exemption, but removing or replacing structural sheathing (plywood/roof sheeting) would remain a permit activity. Miller said the city can offer an educational flyer and planner support for property owners who are unsure about property pins or easements, and staff recommended against requiring a site plan for exempted projects.
Councilmembers asked clarifying questions about roofing, driveways and how staff would notify property owners; Miller and Depot staff described limits and noted Kennewick and Richland were not as restrictive on these exemptions. The mayor summarized that the council appears to have a general notion to move forward and directed staff to draft code changes for formal action at a later meeting.
