Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oneonta committee begins work on tobacco-retail ordinance; debates delivery ban, proximity and license caps
Summary
Committee members reviewed model tobacco-retail ordinances and debated prohibiting delivery, limiting flavored products, proximity limits near youth facilities, caps on retailer licenses, and how to map current retailers; the committee asked the city clerk to review licensing procedures and will continue drafting next month.
The Oneonta Community Wellness Committee on Jan. 9 reviewed model tobacco-retail ordinances and began drafting a local tobacco-free communities policy, discussing delivery bans, flavored-product restrictions, proximity limits to youth-oriented sites and a possible cap on retail licenses.
Council member Lane Moshe Pampoli, who led much of the discussion, said the committee is comparing two model approaches: a more detailed 40-page model from the Public Health Law Center and a more concise model from the American Heart Association. “This is the boiler plate,” she said of the longer model, and noted she planned to highlight, cross out and condense language to fit local needs. She emphasized one provision she favored: the proposed ordinance’s explicit prohibition on delivery services, pointing to a section that “defines delivery sale” and adding, “I like that a lot.”
Committee members discussed definitions, exemptions for tribal or religious practices and how the ordinance should treat FDA-approved cessation products. They debated whether to include retail restrictions tied to licensed cannabis businesses and concluded they would remove a proposed proximity limit to cannabis retailers while keeping restrictions near schools, parks and youth facilities. The group also examined a proposed approach that would limit the number of tobacco-retailer licenses based on population and density. Committee members said population-based limits may be redundant or overly complex for Oneonta and discussed instead using a license cap tied to current counts and a proximity/density mapping exercise.
Members reviewed a preliminary inventory of local retailers (Stewart’s, Sunoco, Red Apple Food Mart, Dollar General/Smoker’s Choice, New York Food Mart and specific smoke shops such as Area 51) and estimated the city has roughly 15 tobacco retailers, though they described that count as approximate and said staff should verify missing entries on the map. The committee said existing licenses would be grandfathered, but new licenses might be restricted in locations that fail proposed proximity rules; members discussed nontransferability of licenses when a business changes ownership.
The committee assigned a homework task to the city clerk to review the current license application and licensing procedures and to provide feedback on what would or would not work administratively. The committee agreed to reconvene on the ordinance after reviewing a retailer-density map and receiving clerk feedback.
No ordinance was adopted; committee members amended and struck portions of the models during the discussion and set follow-up tasks for staff.
