Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the It Plans And Shared Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance committee approves UA System campus IT plans and hires ScottMadden for shared-services redesign

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees approved the UA System annual campus information technology plans and authorized a professional services agreement with ScottMadden Management Consultants to support a shared administrative services redesign tied to an ERP implementation.

The University of Alabama System finance committee approved the system’s annual campus information technology plans and authorized a professional services agreement with ScottMadden Management Consultants to support an organizational redesign of the shared administrative services unit ahead of an enterprise resource planning implementation.

Doctor Dana Keith, senior vice chancellor for finance and administration, told the committee the IT plans were prepared in compliance with Board Rule 406 and report projects that exceed $750,000 in total cost or $250,000 in IT professional services. “Twenty-one percent of the projects in the IT plan are new projects, and the remainder are previously approved ongoing projects,” Keith said.

Keith recommended approval of both the IT plans and the ScottMadden agreement. On the consultant contract, Keith said ScottMadden will “provide structured expertise to strengthen both operational efficiencies and workforce capabilities and align business processes with the upcoming ERP implementation.” The committee moved, seconded and approved both resolutions by voice vote.

Why it matters: The IT plans surface larger technology projects across the system that meet board reporting thresholds and the ScottMadden contract is intended to ready shared administrative services for a systemwide ERP deployment — an implementation that staff described as a material organizational change.

Discussion vs. decision: The committee received staff presentations (discussion) and then approved the annual IT plans and the professional services agreement (formal action). The transcript records no roll-call vote or recorded opposition.