Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council debates whether short-term rental enforcement belongs with codes or ZBA

3683415 · May 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A committee discussed whether revocation and enforcement of short-term rental privileges should remain in the zoning board of appeals or be handled by the city codes department; staff and aldermen argued codes has enforcement authority while ZBA handles variances.

Olean committee members discussed the city’s approach to short-term rental enforcement and whether revocation of a short-term rental privilege should be carried out through the zoning board of appeals (ZBA) or the city codes office.

One member noted the ZBA is not an enforcement division and cannot issue citations, while the codes office has enforcement authority and is the practical body to pursue revocations. Committee members said shifting responsibility between bodies over time has created inconsistency and urged that enforcement measures be given “teeth” in the code if revocation is to be meaningful.

The committee also discussed the procedures for variances related to rental uses and whether a variance reversal requires a unanimous vote when brought back; the meeting record indicates the answer to that procedural question is no — a unanimous vote is not required to reverse a variance.

The committee did not adopt a formal policy change at the meeting; members agreed to move the topic back to a regular council meeting for a vote and asked staff to provide clarifying details about roles and enforcement mechanisms.