Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews city-manager evaluation process, requests contract review for compensation discussion
Summary
Commissioners reviewed the annual charter-required evaluation for the city manager (average score reported as 4.925), discussed comparisons with peer cities, and asked staff to circulate the city manager’s contract ahead of compensation discussion at the next meeting.
At the June 3 meeting the commission conducted the annual charter review process for the city manager and discussed whether to consider compensation adjustments.
City Clerk Sherry reported the compiled evaluation average as 4.925. Commissioners thanked the city manager and his management team for performance; several commissioners said they would like to review the city manager’s contract and compensation comparators from peer cities before any change is proposed. One commissioner asked that the contract be placed on the next meeting agenda, and commissioners agreed to review the contract and comparative data before any compensation vote.
No compensation changes were made at the meeting; the commission directed staff to distribute the city manager’s contract and comparative information and to place the item on the next meeting agenda for further discussion.
Ending: Commissioners encouraged direct, candid feedback during the evaluation process and asked staff to return with contract documents and comparator data for consideration at the next regular meeting.
