Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Civil Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comment: Bethlehem resident urges time-limited bans for patrons at public establishments
Summary
During public comment Artie Curatola urged the city to change local rules so that patrons barred from public establishments would face time-limited bans instead of permanent exclusion; he said he is permanently barred from ArtsQuest and asked the council to consider revisions to the relevant policy language.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Civil Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Artie Curatola, of Bethlehem’s south side, used the public-comment period on June 3 to urge the city to revise local policy language so that patrons banned from public establishments would face time-limited exclusions rather than permanent bans.
Curatola told council members the current provision makes the city “look really bad” when patrons are barred from a public venue indefinitely. He said permanent bans deny people the ability to return and suggested finite durations — for example, weeks, months or years — rather than an indefinite prohibition.
Curatola said he is permanently barred from ArtsQuest despite not being arrested or charged in the incident he described. “I didn’t even cause a scene. I didn’t even — I didn’t assault anybody,” he said. He asked the council to “think about changing that article to making it that they have a time limit.”
The remarks were made during the meeting’s public-comment period; council did not take action on the issue during the session and no staff report or ordinance text change was presented.

