Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State session leaves Will County watching transit funding shortfall, energy and local land-use rules
Summary
Will County's legislative update covered a range of state bills that advanced or stalled in Springfield, and flagged a regional'scale transit funding shortfall that lawmakers did not resolve before adjournment. The committee also discussed state moves affecting county authority over renewable-energy siting.
Will County Board Legislative Committee members received a state legislative briefing May 6 that covered bills relevant to county operations, an unresolved transit funding shortfall, and proposed state changes that further limit county control over renewable energy projects.
State lobbyists from MacStrategies summarized session outcomes and bills the county had tracked. "House Bill 1364, the Joliet Arsenal Development Authority bill, passed both chambers," one presenter said, and other measures such as House Bill 663 (a sanitary-district consolidation) were enacted. Several bills the county followed either passed the budget with partial funding (local health protection grants) or stalled in the Senate.
Presenters described a looming transit "fiscal cliff." State analysts estimate a shortfall for transit agencies in the Chicago region at roughly $770 million for the upcoming fiscal period; presenters warned that, without additional funding, agencies could face service outages. The Senate debated several funding proposals including redirecting revenue streams from collar counties and a per-delivery fee; one package that passed the Senate would have placed a $1.50 delivery fee on most deliveries but excluded groceries and prescriptions. That package did not advance in the House before adjournment, leaving no enacted fix when the legislature recessed.
County members raised questions about bills the board has tracked. The presenters said House Bill 3517 (a DCEO grant for the Joliet Historical Museum) was included in the final budget and that a Quick Take request for 143rd Street (referred to in committee materials as the Will County Quick Take, Hundred And 40 Third Street bill) passed the county board previously and remains a live legislative matter. County staff later told the committee the county's earlier board resolution asking the state for Quick Take powers passed the county board after a tie vote was broken by the county executive.
On energy policy, the presenters said a proposed state energy package stalled late in the session, in part because of concerns that aggressive battery-storage provisions could impose high costs on refineries and risked causing closures. Presenters also said the spring'session included language reaffirming that the state has narrowed counties'authority over siting large renewable-energy projects; the presenters cautioned that the legislature's direction leaves counties with limited permitting levers.
Board members asked for follow-up on several items: the specific status of the Quick Take matter in Springfield, progress on bills that would change truck weights or EV weight exemptions, and tracking of the forest-preserve referendum proposal. Presenters said they would keep the committee updated and add items of local concern (sewers, water outages in Joliet, Asian carp funding) to the county's state agenda for legislators.
No county votes were taken on state bills at the meeting; members directed staff to provide updated bill trackers and to circulate proposed redlines for the county's state legislative agenda.
