Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Bank Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission revives land‑bank authority, asks staff for two‑year operations plan after debate
Summary
The commission voted to reactivate a Land Bank Authority with direction to staff to return an operations and staffing plan; commissioners debated scope, whether funds should be pre‑allocated, and safeguards to prioritize affordable housing.
Get email alerts on the Land Bank Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The mayor and commission voted June 3 to reactivate an Athens‑Clarke County Land Bank Authority and directed staff to return with an operations and staffing plan, including a two‑year work plan and proposed funding. The measure passed 9–1.
The commission’s action followed several hours of discussion and public comment. Supporters called a land bank an important tool to acquire tax‑delinquent or surplus properties and convert them into affordable‑housing or community assets. Commissioner Davenport, who supported the proposal, said the measure could help deliver lots that can be repurposed for housing programs.
Opponents and several commissioners urged restraint and sought stronger guardrails: Commissioner Johnson and others asked that the mayor and commission require a concrete, binding plan before allocating start‑up funds. Johnson called the proposal too broad and raised the risk that a land bank could be used to change zoning or to prioritize higher‑value commercial uses over affordable housing; she asked for a specific plan before any funds were committed.
Commissioner Thornton offered a substitute motion to remove a $275,000 placeholder for start‑up funds and direct staff to return a plan first; that substitute failed on a 5–5 split. The original motion to reactivate the authority, with the staff tasking direction, passed 9–1.
The commission’s resolution asks staff to work with the authority and return an operations plan that would include staffing, contracting, budget and funding details, and a recommended two‑year work plan. Staff and commissioners said any property disposition or significant budget request would return to the mayor and commission for approval.
Commissioners also discussed membership and conflict‑of‑interest safeguards for any appointed authority board; the resolution directs that staff outline governance, potential partnerships and how the land bank would coordinate with the affordable‑housing investment strategy. The next step is for staff to present the requested operations plan and a recommended budget to the commission for review and approval.

