Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves outreach and consultant to evaluate municipal advisory councils for unincorporated East Los Angeles
Summary
After a county report found cityhood for East Los Angeles fiscally infeasible in 2022–23 assumptions, the Board voted to retain a consultant to conduct multilingual outreach and design options for municipal advisory councils or town councils to provide community input and advisory recommendations for the large unincorporated area.
Lede: The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on June 3 approved a motion directing the CEO to retain a consultant to perform multilingual, culturally competent outreach and to recommend a structure — municipal advisory councils (MACs) or elected town councils — for unincorporated East Los Angeles.
Nut graf: The CEO’s fiscal analysis, presented at the meeting, concluded that under the service assumptions used by LAFCO in 2012 a new city of East Los Angeles would have faced a structural deficit (the staff update showed roughly $45.5 million in projected revenue against $73.3 million in operating costs for FY22‑23, leaving an estimated deficit of about $27.8 million). Because cityhood appeared financially unviable, the board directed a consultant to design community engagement and present options for local advisory structures and how they might operate.
Body: Supervisor Hilda Solis framed the motion by summarizing the CEO’s report: it updated LAFCO’s earlier analysis and found a day‑one fiscal shortfall should East LA attempt cityhood. “Cityhood simply isn't financially viable for East Los Angeles at this time,” she said, citing the $27.8 million operating deficit in the staff model for FY22‑23.
CEO staff explained the revenue bases considered—property, sales and utility taxes—and noted that California property tax law (Proposition 13) constrains local property tax increases. The CEO’s presentation said the 2012 LAFCO analysis already concluded incorporation would be infeasible and the updated numbers widen that shortfall when current service assumptions were applied.
The board’s motion does not attempt to incorporate the area; instead it directs the CEO to retain a consultant to conduct broad outreach, solicit resident and stakeholder input on community governance options (including MACs or town councils), and return to the board in 180 days with proposed structures, engagement findings and recommendations.
Community leaders and dozens of residents spoke during public comment. Several nonprofit leaders and long‑time East LA residents told the board they support the retention of a consultant and welcomed steps to create an accountable advisory mechanism. Others insisted any local body should be elected rather than appointed and asked for greater financial transparency, including an annual budget for the unincorporated area.
Ending: The Board approved the motion; staff said they will engage departments across county government to collect data and convene community meetings. Supervisors said they expect a written summary of outreach and a recommended structure within the stated timeline.
