Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Risk Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District secures liability renewal with extended retro date; board approves renewal and directs further market search for umbrella coverage
Summary
The board approved the district’s insurance renewal covering general liability and errors & omissions, with staff negotiating a retroactive date back to July 1, 2009 to preserve tail coverage; the board asked staff to continue seeking umbrella policies and alternatives.
The board approved the district’s annual insurance renewal after staff reported they had negotiated a key retroactive date change with the vendor.
Staff and the district’s insurance broker presented renewal numbers and highlighted a negotiated change to the retroactive date for prior‑acts coverage (commonly called tail coverage). The retroactive date in the materials had earlier been 2015; staff reported they worked with the broker to secure a retro date of July 1, 2009. Board members said that earlier retroactive coverage was important to protect the district from claims arising from a longer historical window.
The renewal package totals approximately $1.987 million, a roughly 3.7 percent increase over the prior year, according to staff. The presentation also noted the district’s effort to re‑establish umbrella coverage; staff said multiple umbrella carriers were being solicited and some declined, and the district would continue marketing the umbrella placement to broaden primary and excess liability protection.
Board members voted 6–0 to approve the renewal as presented and asked staff and the district’s insurance broker to continue the effort to secure umbrella coverage and to investigate alternatives over the coming months. One board member also moved that staff investigate other markets and approaches so the district is not dependent on a single carrier in future renewals. The board emphasized the importance of full coverage for past acts and of continuing to seek excess/umbrella protection as markets permit.
Staff said they would continue negotiating umbrella placements and report back to the board on further developments; any changes would be brought to the board for approval before binding.
