Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keith County approves USDA Wildlife Services agreement for up to $16,449 to address wildlife damage

3670812 · May 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved a service agreement with USDA Wildlife Services covering mitigation of wildlife damage in Keith County, with a potential annual cost up to $16,449.40; the contractor said the program typically bills only for hours used and intends to explore broader state funding for the program.

The Keith County Board of Commissioners approved a one‑year service agreement with USDA Wildlife Services to continue wildlife‑damage mitigation work in the county, with staff citing a potential fiscal exposure up to $16,449.40 for the contract year.

Jeremy (USDA Wildlife Services) told the board the agreement could represent up to 500 hours of service, but the county is billed only for hours actually provided; the figure presented to the board for contract budgeting was $16,449.40. Services include responding to livestock predation and property‑damage complaints, addressing beaver and muskrat issues, and special‑permit actions for protected avian predators when those actions are justified.

Commissioner Anderson moved to authorize the chair to sign the service agreement; Commissioner Irvin seconded. The motion passed on roll call with all voting “yes.” The board noted that Jeremy’s office provides phone advice between deployments and that seasonal demand can create waitlists during peak periods.

Jeremy said the program’s new supervisor, Ryan Powers, plans to contact county leaders about pursuing state funding options so county contributions could be supplemented to sustain broader service across multiple counties. Board members asked staff to send a signed copy of the agreement to USDA and to coordinate any follow‑up meeting requests.

The board recorded the motion as approval of a service contract; staff will complete signature and distribution steps.