Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bonner County ambulance district approves $155,556.81 in payments; bookkeeper and forecast discussed
Summary
The Bonner County Ambulance Service District approved FY25 payment batches totaling $155,556.81 and received an updated budget forecast and clarifications about expected one‑time and recurring revenues.
The Bonner County Ambulance Service District voted to approve payment of claims and demands totaling $155,556.81 and heard an updated budget forecast and revenue clarifications.
Board members approved payment of claims batch no. 34 for $48,047.12 and demand batch no. 34 for $107,509.69, for a combined total of $155,556.81. The board approved the payments by roll call; the motion passed.
The move to approve the payments was made on the record as: “Based on the information before us, I move to approve payment of the fiscal year ’25 … claims in batch number 34 totaling $48,047.12 and demands batch number 34 totaling $107,509.69 for a grand total of $155,556.81.” The board’s vote was recorded as yes and the motion carried.
The board also discussed line‑item clarifications tied to an SIF (Self‑Insurance Fund) payment and a prior credit. One member asked for clarification of the SIF value; staff answered that a carried‑forward credit reduced the total due.
Finance staff provided a budget forecast: current cash on hand was reported as $1,166,000; forecasted revenue was reported as $1,700,040 (including an expected tax deposit in July); total available funds were reported as $2,906,069; forecasted expenditures were reported as $1,000,006.91; and the forecast ending balance was reported at about $1,200,000. The board and staff noted that some anticipated revenues — specifically Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) reimbursements and urban renewal district refunds — were not included in the current fiscal‑year figures and would appear, if received, in future accounting periods.
On urban renewal funds, staff said they had been denied a small Old Town request (around $2,000) but had been informed informally that the Dover 1 urban renewal reimbursement, described in the meeting as roughly “sixty‑something thousand,” was approved; staff said they would not consider the revenue realized until documentation or the check is received.
The forecast discussion prompted no public comments and the board moved on to other agenda items.
