Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County panel advances short‑term rental request for 15‑acre parcel after preliminary review
Summary
A planning committee voted to advance an applicant’s request to the Madison County Planning Commission to permit two dome-style short‑term rental units and tag a primitive campground designation for a 15‑acre parcel on tax map 30‑5c, subject to health, VDOT and deed/easement review.
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A Madison County planning committee advanced a proposal Monday to the planning commission that would allow two dome‑style short‑term rental units on a 15‑acre parcel identified as Madison County tax map 30‑5c, with staff advising the committee to tag the application as both a short‑term rental and primitive campground under the county zoning code.
The proposal came from Kelsey Schlein, a planner with Schimpf Engineering, who said the applicant intends to build dome tents on deck platforms with electricity and plumbing; Aida Alamo, identified in the meeting as the property owner, confirmed the existing house on the parcel already operates as a short‑term rental.
County planning and zoning administrator Alan Nichols said the project “needs a little bit of deliberation” because the applicant has applied for decks and platforms and staff must determine whether to permit the sites under short‑term rental rules, primitive campground rules, or both. “I think that it may be pertinent to get them permitted under the short‑term rental provisions and just tag a primitive campground along with it,” Nichols said.
Why it matters: the parcel is 15 acres in Agricultural‑1 (A‑1) zoning and the county’s ordinance limits dwelling density by acreage; Nichols and committee members discussed how a 15‑acre parcel could support multiple permitted structures and that, under current ordinances, the parcel could support up to five dwelling‑equivalent sites with a special‑use permit. Committee members and staff also flagged public‑safety and infrastructure questions that must be resolved before a Planning Commission hearing.
Committee and agency concerns focused on three issues. First, the ownership and safety of an unfinished framed structure on the parcel: committee members advised the owner to secure or board that building so guests—particularly children—cannot access it. Second, health‑department review of water and sewage: Schlein and Alamo said they have a construction permit and a sewage feasibility report; a Madison County Health Department representative told the committee that the department must review engineered septic plans, wastewater characterization and potentially require bacterial testing of the well because the proposed units will be a commercial use.
Third, access and easement questions emerged. Several committee members noted the parcel accesses Route 231 via a driveway that appears to cross or pass near neighboring property owned by a Jim Durham, and they recommended deed research and conversations with adjacent landowners about easement rights. VDOT staff present said the project would likely require documentation demonstrating stopping‑sight distance and that, if the use intensifies above a private residence, VDOT could require a low‑volume commercial entrance or other entrance improvements.
No formal conditions were adopted at the exploratory meeting. A motion to advance the application to the Planning Commission as a short‑term rental special‑use permit carried; staff said they will follow up with the applicant on next steps and documentation needed for septic, well testing, easement/deed research and any VDOT entrance materials.
The committee’s referral to the Planning Commission means the applicant must supply the requested supporting materials and that the proposal will receive a public hearing at a later date. Planning staff told the applicant they will circulate procedural guidance and a checklist for the planning‑commission submission.

