Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance director outlines FY26 budget risks after reassessment, cites $650M in exemptions and frozen homestead values

3670841 · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district finance director told the board that reassessments and a large rise in exemption totals — driven in part by the district’s opt-in to a floating homestead exemption under House Bill 581 — complicate FY26 revenue projections and budget planning.

The Catoosa County schools finance director presented a budget progress report on June 3 that emphasized how reassessments and new exemptions will affect the district’s FY26 revenue projections and millage-rate decisions.

District staff said the county board of assessors approved about $222 million in increased assessed value for existing property, but new exemptions and the district’s opt-in to the House Bill 581 floating homestead exemption mean the net taxable reassessment value is substantially smaller. The presentation identified about $39.7 million in new property growth that was largely offset by $40.1 million in new exemptions and an $87 million exemption total arising from the district’s adoption of House Bill 581 mechanics. Overall exemptions were projected to rise to roughly $650 million (about a 24% increase) for tax year 2025.

District staff noted those mechanics freeze homesteaded property taxable values at their 2024 levels for this tax year; the Department of Revenue-set inflation adjustment can change values in later years. The finance director gave a worked example: an average $275,000 home with a homestead exemption would pay the same school tax in 2025 as in 2024 if the millage rate remains at 14.87. If inflation-adjusted reassessment applies next year, the example homeowner would see an estimated $50 increase at a 3% inflation factor.

The director said the district expects to lose the opportunity to capture about $590,000 in revenue that would have been associated with the $39.7 million in new property growth. He listed outstanding items the board needs to finalize the budget: the final local tax digest (after the appeal period, expected mid‑July), federal and state grant allocations (timing varies), and final calculations for any payroll/benefit changes tied to the Kelly Services staffing transition. The finance presentation included current FY26 projection figures: revenues of about $142.4 million and expenditures of about $141.9 million, giving a modest projected surplus of roughly $420,480 assuming the current millage of 14.87 and the estimates presented.

The director also summarized prior cost-reduction steps taken by district leadership: elimination of more than 90 positions over two years (estimated savings of roughly $5.3 million), department-level expense reductions, participation in the Peach State education tax credit program, and accounting shifts that moved some costs to ESSER/East Blos in keeping with GASB guidance.