Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Utilization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants outline utilization study process, committee of about 25, seven meetings and building tours
Summary
Consultants presenting to the North Syracuse Central School District Board described a community‑led utilization study that will convene roughly 25 volunteers for seven two‑hour meetings, include optional building tours, rely on district data, and aim to return a draft report to the board in late 2024 or early January.
Consultants advising the North Syracuse Central School District told the Board of Education their utilization study will be driven by a 25‑member community advisory committee, seven committee meetings and optional building tours, with a draft report expected by December or mid‑January.
The consultants said the committee will meet in district buildings, with tours beginning at 5:30 p.m. and meetings running 6–8 p.m. “The meetings will rotate among your buildings, and weve already mapped that out in in conjunction with the district, cabinet,” Deb, a consultant and retired assistant superintendent for administration at OCM BOCES, told the board. She and her colleagues said they have requested extensive district data and praised district staff for providing timely and accurate information so far.
The study team will host seven meetings with the community committee but said additional meetings might be scheduled if new ideas emerge. “We will present a lot of data for them. That usually will generate some discussion among the committee members,” Deb said. The team said they will provide meeting notes after each session, ask the committee to correct any misrepresentations, and post materials to a district web page for transparency.
Dr. Jen Heckathorn, a consultant with a PhD in teaching and curriculum from Syracuse University, said the selection of the committee is crucial. She and the other consultants described the committees role as soliciting input from their stakeholder groups and returning that input to the committee so the final recommendations represent community perspectives. Consultants said the district cabinet members and board members may attend as a resource but will not participate in committee deliberations to avoid unduly influencing the group.
Consultants described output as options rather than a single prescription: multiple viable recommendations will be provided with pros and cons. They said they will share a draft with the committee before finalizing it and then present the final report to the board, aiming for a December presentation that may extend into mid‑January depending on holidays and committee schedule.
Board members asked about committee membership and attendance, including contingencies if volunteers stop participating. Consultants said they had not previously removed members for lack of representation, instead working with the members who remain and, if necessary, asking the district to revisit the volunteer list to add members mid‑process. The consultants said they intentionally posted meeting dates on application materials so volunteers understand the time commitment.
The consultants also clarified that committee meetings will be open to observers but will not include a public comment period so the committee can focus on deliberations.
The presentation generated no formal board action; it was informational and the district will proceed with forming the community advisory committee and scheduling the meetings.
