Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Third Grade Retention And Tcap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford County reports third-grade ELA results: 46% proficient including exemptions; leaders urge clearer parent communications
Summary
District officials reported third-grade English-language arts (ELA) TCAP results and discussed exemptions, retention rules and summer supports. Staff said 46% of third graders were proficient with exemptions included and 66.5% of non-exempt students were proficient; about 47% of third graders qualified for exemptions.
Rutherford County Schools officials presented third-grade English-language arts (ELA) assessment results at the district’s May work session and discussed how exemptions and retention policies affect families and schools.
Dr. Trent Chastain, district assessment lead, told the board that with retakes considered the district’s current third-grade ELA TCAP proficiency rate is roughly 46 percent when exemptions are included. He added that about 47 percent of third graders met exemption criteria this year — including students with identified reading disabilities, suspected disabilities, or English-language learners — and that among students who were not exempt the proficiency rate is about 66.5 percent.
“This is not a measurement of whether students can read,” Dr. Chastain said, explaining that the TCAP ELA is a standards-based assessment used as a statutory proxy for retention decisions. Board members expressed concern that the law and media coverage can make parents feel the result is a personal failure for a child. “The state did a terrible job when they brought this out and about educating parents,” said board member Mark Vaughn, urging clearer communications about what the test measures.
The board reviewed district responses aimed at increasing early intervention and supports: the district uses AIMSweb universal screening and plans more focused monitoring in pre-K through second grade; instructional leaders noted about 800 third graders were already signed up for the district’s summer camp program and around 2,870 rising kindergarten through fifth-grade students had enrolled districtwide for summer services.
Board members and staff discussed the limits of short-term remediation: while summer camp and post-tests can demonstrate growth, staff cautioned that measuring adequate annual growth over a short summer is imperfect. Dr. Chastain said the district is exploring better measures to capture summer impacts and continuing to invest in early-grade interventions.
The discussion also covered appeals and exemptions. Staff reported that 436 students were eligible for a retake-based appeal pathway (students above the 40th percentile on screening); students above the 50th percentile were pulled automatically. Board members asked staff to increase outreach and community town halls to explain the standards and the supports available to families.
No policy action was taken at the work session; staff said they will provide final scorefiles once state results are certified and will continue outreach and support planning for the coming school year.
