Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Meadowbrook Ulid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Bend approves Meadowbrook ULID construction, construction management and funding notes
Summary
City council awarded the Meadowbrook Improvements construction contract, approved a construction-management amendment and authorized a water and sewer revenue note to finance Meadowbrook Unit/ULID No. 7 after staff described long-running petition work, cost-allocation agreements and legal assurances about developer guarantees.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Meadowbrook Ulid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The North Bend City Council on June 3 approved construction and related contracts and authorized short‑term financing for the Meadowbrook Improvements project, a multi‑street water, sewer and roadway package to serve parcels west and downslope of the Snoqualmie River.
The council accepted the low bid and awarded the construction contract for the Meadowbrook Improvement Project to Northwest Construction Inc.; approved Amendment No. 2 to the city’s construction‑management and inspection contract with Grama Osborne in an amount not to exceed $1,160,540; and authorized the issuance of water and sewer bond‑anticipation notes to fund construction of Meadowbrook ULID No. 7.
The Meadowbrook work packages include sewer service to the ULID area (about 65 parcels, by staff count), new water mains on Northwest Eighth and Northwest Fourteenth Streets to improve fire flow and redundancy, and roadway replacement and paving. Staff said the project was bid at roughly $10,300,000 (the low bid was slightly below the engineer’s estimate) and that construction is expected to take about 12 to 14 months. Mark Rigos, who presented the staff report, said, “The engineering on this has been occurring for the past 18 months or so.”
Why this matters: the project implements a property owner‑led utility local improvement district (ULID) that city staff and consultants say will replace aging septic systems, allow more development consistent with zoning, and help stabilize sewer rates by increasing connections and generating general facility charges (GFCs) the city can use to repay wastewater capital costs. Staff and bond counsel told council that financing follows a common two‑step approach: the city will issue short‑term notes to cover construction and later refinance those notes with longer‑term bonds once the project is complete.
Key legal and financial points discussed in the meeting included cost allocation agreements offered earlier by Puget Western for some property owners in the ULID boundary. City attorneys confirmed they had communications with Puget Western’s counsel and understood Puget Western remained contractually liable under those agreements even after selling the property to another company (Vector Development). Bond counsel Deanna Gregory told council that repayment of future bonds is secured not only by ULID assessments and guarantor payments but also by “a pledge of the revenues of the utility,” providing an additional repayment source if assessments fall short.
Council members pressed staff and counsel on contingency and default risks. City counsel explained that if assessments are unpaid for two or more years the municipal code (consistent with state law) requires the city to foreclose on delinquent assessments, and that the city would typically seek council authority before initiating litigation or foreclosure steps. Council also asked for regular written status reports from staff during construction; staff agreed to provide brief monthly memos to council tracking schedule and costs.
Formal actions and votes: the resolution awarding the construction contract (AB25‑055) was approved by council as moved and seconded on the dais and carried unanimously. The construction‑management amendment with Grama Osborne (AB25‑056) — described by staff as necessary because the city has one in‑house inspector and needs daily construction administration — was approved in an amount not to exceed $1,160,540; the vote on that amendment was 7‑0. Council also approved ordinance AB25‑057 authorizing the sale of water and sewer revenue notes to fund the Meadowbrook construction; that ordinance passed unanimously.
What happens next: staff will execute contracts, coordinate inspections and begin construction mobilization; staff said the low bid rate is valid for 60 days (bids opened in April) and that construction mobilization was planned to start in June. Staff also noted the ULID assessment program allows property owners to repay their assessments over an extended term (staff cited 15 to 20 years as an example), which reduces upfront cost pressure on residents.
Details and open questions: council members noted the distinction between commercial property owners and residential owners in how assessments affect each group and stressed vigilance if developers sell parcels after committing to cost allocations. Staff and counsel said they would monitor payment performance and bring any necessary requests for legal authority back to council. No litigation or foreclosure action was proposed at the meeting.
Reporting note: developer and private‑party comments in the packet included remarks by Tyler Litzenberger of Vector Development Company, who said having “city sewer and city domestic water in terms of the ability to get financing and and obtain first class tenants” is essential to his company’s projects in the Tanner Road/North Bend Way corridor.
Ending: With contracts and short‑term financing in place, the Meadowbrook Improvements project will move into construction later this month. Council and staff said they will return with periodic status updates and any required legal actions if assessments become delinquent.

