Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Income Tax Options topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board examines income-tax alternatives — traditional vs. earned — but conversion not feasible this year

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff spent part of the June 4 work session explaining income-tax alternatives, how they differ from property levies and why conversion to an earned-income base would take time and additional steps.

District staff spent part of the June 4 work session explaining income-tax alternatives, how they differ from property levies and why conversion to an earned-income base would take time and additional steps.

Presenters said Perrysburg currently collects a 0.5% traditional local income tax and described the traditional base (wages, interest, dividends, pension income, social security as applicable) versus an earned-income tax, which covers wages, salaries and net self-employment income but excludes dividends, interest and many other nonwage items. Staff noted that an earned-income base typically produces a smaller tax base, so the percentage required to generate an equivalent dollar amount is higher. "If we convert a 0.5% traditional income tax to an earned income tax," a staff presenter said, "you'd likely need to put 0.75% or a higher quarter-percent increment on the ballot to achieve equivalent revenue."

Staff explained the procedural and timing constraints: a conversion (replace existing traditional with an earned-income tax at an equivalent or higher rate) is possible but requires a ballot question to replace the existing levy; if the district wanted both a converted levy and an additional earned-income levy, that would take multiple ballot steps and cannot be completed in a single November cycle. The district is awaiting formal certification from the Ohio Department of Taxation to get precise estimates for earned-income equivalents; staff said past conversions have resulted in higher percentage demands (for example, a half-percent traditional tax once equated to roughly three-quarters of a percent on an earned-income base in prior analyses).

Staff also noted timing differences: property levies take effect on Jan. 1 following a November election and generate collections on a predictable schedule; income taxes are collected on a calendar-year basis and often ramp up as withholdings and annual filings, so revenue does not arrive as immediately as property-tax collections in the first year.

Data point: staff cited the CUP report (Ohio Department of Education and Workforce) showing an average Perrysburg filer income of $118,315.75 in tax year 2022; staff said the Department of Taxation uses federal-return aggregates to certify expected yields and that the district has requested that certification.

Ending: Board members acknowledged the income-tax discussion as a longer-term strategic option but told staff an earned-income conversion is not a feasible short-term fix for the district’s immediate cash needs. Staff will pursue Department of Taxation certification and include income-tax scenarios in future planning.