Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Counsel Hiring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council signals interest in hiring outside legal counsel for ad‑hoc representation and agrees to return proposal June 16
Summary
Council members discussed retaining outside legal counsel to represent council on matters potentially in conflict with the city law department’s representation of the mayor and city; members asked for a scoped proposal to return at the next meeting.
Cleveland Heights council members discussed contracting outside legal counsel to provide council‑level representation on an ad‑hoc basis and asked the item be developed into a proposed scope and fee arrangement to return at the June 16 meeting.
Council members said situations can arise where the city law department faces competing duties—representing the mayor, city administration and council—and observed that limited exceptions or conflicts can make separate council counsel appropriate. Several council members said they supported a retainer or hourly arrangement for targeted matters; the law director said this concept is feasible and that the law department did not object to council seeking outside counsel for specific purposes.
Councilman Cobb, who is a lawyer, urged caution but agreed a narrowly scoped, case‑by‑case arrangement could be useful. Council discussed standard options such as an hourly retainer for discrete legal matters and asked that a proposed scope and contract terms be prepared. One council member reported having previously discussed potential counsel with the law director and an outside lawyer, and asked permission to pursue that contact as a basis for a proposal.
Council agreed to ask proponents to return with a short proposal and proposed scope for council review at the June 16 meeting. No contract was executed or authorized at this meeting.
