Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Iroquois County committee adopts tougher code-enforcement language to allow fines and attorney-fee recovery
Summary
Committee approved a resolution amending county code section 14 to allow daily fines up to $1,000 for property nuisances and to permit recovery of attorney fees; staff said county will apply checks to avoid excessive county outlays.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Iroquois County committee voted June 3 to adopt a resolution amending county code to strengthen enforcement against properties the county considers blighted or a health hazard.
County staff member Julie presented the changes to section 14 of the county code that add an ability to recover attorney fees and raise the maximum daily fine for violations to $1,000 per day. Julie told the panel the language would allow the county to seek reimbursement of attorney time (she referenced a likely county attorney by name) and to collect fines if property owners fail to remedy violations after notice.
Committee members discussed concerns about the county’s potential out-of-pocket costs, enforcement thresholds and whether liens or judgments will be collectible when property owners lack assets. One committee member said the county must “go slow” to avoid incurring large legal bills that the county cannot recover. Another said the ordinance gives the county additional enforcement “teeth” and that staff will apply checks and balances before pursuing aggressive measures.
After discussion, a committee member moved to adopt the resolution; the motion was seconded and the committee voted in favor. Committee members said the change provides staff with an enforcement tool they may choose to use on a case‑by‑case basis.
Why it matters: The change expands the county’s enforcement options for problem properties but also raises fiscal and equity questions for enforcement of liens and the county’s willingness to pursue costly remediation actions when property owners lack resources.
Staff said they will return to the committee or county board for further guidance on use and that initial implementation will be measured to avoid undue county expense.

