Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves purchase of former utility parcel at Mullen Road for affordable housing development
Summary
The council voted to acquire a roughly five-acre LOTT Clean Water Alliance parcel at 5025 Mullen Road for $450,000, conditioned on affordable-housing use; staff said the site is developable and will be offered to an affordable-housing partner.
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City Council on June 3 voted unanimously to authorize the city manager to acquire a roughly five-acre parcel at 5025 Mullen Road Southeast from LOTT Clean Water Alliance for $450,000 plus half of escrow and closing fees, provided the site be used for affordable housing consistent with state law and recently adopted local code.
Community Development staff presented a due-diligence summary: an appraisal returned a $700,000 market value; LOTT agreed to sell at $450,000—their purchase price—if the city used the property for affordable housing under RCW provisions allowing surplus public property transfers at below-appraised value. Staff reported a gopher-study found no gopher habitat and that pre-submittal review with public-works engineering, building and planning concluded the parcel is developable. The site sits across from Camas Middle School and is zoned open space/institutional.
Under the terms of the April 16, 2025 purchase-and-sale agreement, the city may reacquire the parcel for non-affordable-housing uses only by repaying the $250,000 difference up to appraised value plus an inflation adjustment. Staff recommended acquisition and said discussions with an affordable-housing developer would begin after closing; staff plans to return to council with a development-sale agreement and specific terms.
Outcome: The council approved the manager’s authority to acquire the property at the $450,000 price, plus half escrow and incidental fees. The motion passed unanimously.
Why it matters: The parcel is positioned as an affordable-housing opportunity near a school and could support ownership or rental units depending on partnering arrangements; the city's ability to purchase at below-appraised value depends on state surplus-property rules and the local ordinance (Ordinance 16-73) enacted earlier in the year to enable surplus-property transfers for affordable housing.
What happens next: City staff will continue developer discussions and prepare terms of disposition; if the city later decides not to use the parcel for affordable housing it must repay LOTT to reach appraised value per the purchase-and-sale agreement.

