Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Z68 Saks Austell topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends convenience store with fuel sales on Austell Road after DOT sign‑off on traffic study
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 5‑0 to recommend rezoning to allow a convenience store with fuel sales and a drive‑through restaurant on Austell Road after CobbDOT performed a high‑level review of a recently submitted traffic study and found no immediate objections.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Z68 Saks Austell topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning case Z68 of 2024 for a retail center on Austell Road that will include a convenience store with fuel sales, inline retail tenants and a 2,200‑square‑foot drive‑through restaurant.
Applicant representative Junaid Birani said the project has been revised to address earlier requests for landscaping and lighting plans and that the applicant had responded to two rounds of GDOT comments. CobbDOT analyst Amy Diaz told commissioners that the applicant submitted a traffic study the day before the hearing; DOT had conducted a high‑level review and did not expect substantive problems that would prevent the rezoning from proceeding to the Board of Commissioners, provided final DOT comments are addressed in time.
Why it matters: The case authorizes fuel sales at a site on Austell Road and includes required conditions: final site plan and elevations to be approved by the district commissioner; variance items listed in the zoning comments; and reviews and approvals from the fire marshal, water and sewer, stormwater and the Department of Transportation. Commissioners emphasized the applicant should address DOT comments prior to the Board of Commissioners hearing.
Commissioner Anderson moved the recommendation and listed the standard conditions, including adherence to Austell Road design guidelines and service-station canopy regulations. The motion passed 5‑0.
Record: No members of the public spoke in opposition at the hearing; the applicant agreed to work with DOT during the permit review and engineering phases.

