Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts resolution to validate March annual meeting after online-participation complaint
Summary
Following attorney advice, the board passed a resolution intended to cure alleged procedural errors at the March annual meeting related to online participation and to validate actions taken by voters.
The Barre Unified Union School District board adopted a resolution to “cure and correct” procedural errors alleged in relation to the district’s March annual meeting and to validate the action of the qualified voters at that meeting.
Board members discussed the complaint and the attorney’s recommendation that the board adopt a validating resolution under state law to put the issue to rest. The superintendent explained that Google Meet/online participation had been available for the March meeting and that state statute requires in-person participation for an annual meeting; the complaint contended online participation was improper. The district’s counsel advised a validating resolution as the remedial step.
The resolution, read aloud during the meeting, states the board wishes to cure any errors or omissions and finds any such errors were “the result of oversight, inadvertence, or mistake.” The resolution references state statutory authority as the legal basis for curing the meeting, cited in the discussion as 17 V.S.A. §2662 (the meeting text as read contained a transcription variant; the board recorded the attorney-recommended resolution and voted to adopt it).
The board then voted to validate the March meeting by voice vote; the motion passed and officers were instructed to sign the resolution.
Why it matters: The resolution is intended to resolve a formal complaint about whether the district’s March annual meeting complied with Vermont municipal-election expectations regarding in-person participation. Adopting a validating resolution is a common administrative step to correct procedural defects and confirm the legality of previously acted votes.
What the board will do next: The superintendent and legal counsel said they will provide details about switching annual meeting articles to Australian ballot procedures if the board wishes to pursue that change later; the board will consider timing and notification requirements.
