Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Plan 2040 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff present targeted updates to Topeka’s Land Use and Growth Management Plan 2040
Summary
Planning staff outlined proposed map and text updates to the Land Use and Growth Management Plan (2040), focusing on consistency with recent zoning changes, encouraging adaptive reuse of commercial sites for multifamily housing, and cleaning up annexation and node designations; commissioners asked for updated vacant‑land data.
City planning staff presented proposed updates to Topeka’s Land Use and Growth Management Plan (the future land use map and accompanying text) intended to align the plan with recent zoning code amendments and annexations and to encourage adaptive reuse of vacant or underused commercial properties for medium‑ and higher‑density residential uses.
Staff explained the future land use map is not a zoning map but is one of several factors considered in rezoning and conditional‑use decisions. Proposed text edits would update density references, add guidance encouraging adaptive reuse of commercial properties for multifamily housing and reflect how policies have been interpreted since the 2015 plan adoption. Staff said many changes are intended to be clarifications or cleanups rather than major policy shifts.
Presentations included map excerpts showing areas recommended for adjustment: annexed parcels and areas where existing zoning and use differ from the map, commercial nodes that staff recommends recategorizing toward mixed use or medium‑density residential, and areas where floodplain constraints warrant limiting commercial expansion. Staff noted one PUD amendment from the current meeting (Fairlawn Acres) would be reflected on the map to show a higher‑density residential component in and around that node.
Commissioner Cutts asked about specific wording under the “medium/high‑density residential” heading and suggested replacing an instance of “single‑family” with “low‑density” for consistency. Staff confirmed the downtown language shown in the draft would be handled differently: downtown policies would remain in their district or neighborhood plan content rather than repeated on the city‑wide future land use map. Commissioners also asked staff to update a map that used 2014 vacant‑land data; staff said they maintain a Development and Growth Management (DGM) report and buildable prime vacant lots (BPVLs) dataset and agreed to update the map to reflect more current data.
Staff said the next step is to package the map changes and any needed text amendments into a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) for further review; they indicated they are close to a package and will return to the commission with a complete set for consideration.
