Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison committee votes 4-3 to allow council to start as early as 5:30, set 6 p.m. normal start
Summary
The Madison Common Council Executive Committee on June 3 voted 4-3 to recommend an ordinance change to let Common Council meetings begin as early as 5:30 p.m., while listing 6 p.m. as the general start time; the measure now goes to full council for consideration.
The Madison Common Council Executive Committee on June 3 voted 4-3 to recommend to full council an ordinance amendment that would let the Common Council start meetings “not earlier than 05:30” while setting a general start time of 6 p.m. The committee recorded four yes votes and three no votes; the measure will be considered by the full Common Council this evening.
Supporters of the change said it would give the city flexibility to move some meeting starts earlier when an agenda is especially long or when scheduling conflicts arise, and would align the council’s timetable with other boards and commissions. Opponents said the change could reduce accessibility for working residents and for alder members with 9-to-5 jobs or students with classes that end between 5:00 and 5:30 p.m.
City staff presented data collected by the council legislative analyst, who examined meeting lengths and time use for council meetings since January 2024. The staff presentation noted a wide range of meeting durations and recommended setting 6 p.m. as the usual start while preserving the option to move earlier on specific, noticed meeting dates.
Attorney and staff explanations emphasized notice and logistics. The committee was told that Information Technology staff need advance notice to support hybrid or staffed meetings and prefer a month’s notice, with at least two weeks required in some cases. The staff presentation outlined an operational approach in which an earlier start would be added to the agenda in advance, following the city’s standard public‑notice practice.
Alders who opposed the change repeatedly raised accessibility concerns. Alder Tishler said shifting start times earlier could make attendance difficult for committee members who hold full‑time jobs and for residents with work or family responsibilities. Alder Duncan said she would not support changing the ordinance and expressed concern about widening gaps for working residents and families. Alder Madison also opposed the change, citing potential negative consequences for participation and constituent access.
Other committee members suggested the discussion could prompt a broader review of when the council holds meetings, including whether weekday evenings remain the best option for public participation. Vice President Govinda Rajan, who voted yes, said he initially supported the idea of earlier meetings to shorten evenings but later recognized the tradeoffs for students and workers. After roll call the committee recorded yes votes from Vice President Govinda Rajan, Alder Ugare, Alder Lankella and President Fittiberg; no votes were recorded from Alder Matthews, Alder Tishler and Alder Madison.
The motion to recommend approval will move to full Common Council for consideration later the same day. The committee did not change any council rules regarding meeting end times; questions about adding a formal end time were raised during discussion but were not part of the ordinance amendment before the committee.
The committee’s packet notes and staff presentation said that if an earlier start were needed for a specific meeting, the earlier start would be listed on the posted agenda and handled the same way the city now lists meeting modality (hybrid/online/in‑person). IT staff asked for at least two weeks’ notice and said a month would be preferable to arrange staffing and equipment support.
