Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Rules Meeting Times topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison council rejects changing start time; amendments to allow earlier starts fail
Summary
The Common Council debated and rejected proposals to permit meetings to start earlier than 6:30 p.m.; an amendment to set a 6:00 p.m. floor failed and the main motion to allow starts as early as 5:30 p.m. failed on roll call.
Madison—s Common Council considered and rejected an ordinance change that would have allowed council meetings to start earlier than the current 6:30 p.m. time. Two separate proposals failed on roll call votes on June 3.
Why it matters: The start-time debate drew sustained discussion because members said earlier starts could help end meetings earlier and accommodate schedules, while opponents cautioned that earlier starts would reduce public participation and create scheduling complications for residents and alders.
What happened: Council President Vittiver introduced the ordinance to modify the start time to permit earlier starts. Alder Govindarajan offered an amendment to set a new earliest start of 6:00 p.m. rather than 5:30 p.m.; that amendment failed on a roll call vote of 4 ayes and 16 noes. The main motion to allow meetings to begin as early as 5:30 p.m. was then put to the body and failed on a roll call vote of 2 ayes and 18 noes.
Discussion highlights: Alders opposed the change for several reasons. Alder Duncan said she would not support the change because it could limit participation by residents who work typical workdays and could create quorum problems if members could not arrive by an earlier start. Alder Knox said 6:30 p.m. was a better time to enable broad public participation. Alder Madison said members were elected knowing meetings begin at 6:30 p.m. and opposed adding flexibility that could be used irregularly. Alder Govindarajan, who proposed the 6:00 p.m. amendment, said a 6:00 p.m. compromise might be acceptable but that 5:30 p.m. would be problematic.
Alder Vittiver argued the change would create flexibility similar to other procedural flexibilities (for example, hybrid meeting options) and could allow meetings to start earlier on occasion to finish earlier, with advance notice.
Outcome: Both the Govindarajan amendment (to no earlier than 6:00 p.m.) and the main motion (to permit starts at 5:30 p.m.) failed on recorded roll-call votes. The council retained the existing ordinance requirement that the Common Council not start earlier than 6:30 p.m.
