Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Petitions Joint Rule 12 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House suspends Joint Rule 12 to refer three petitions, including cash‑acceptance and ABV labeling measures
Summary
The Massachusetts House suspended Joint Rule 12 to allow referral of three petitions filed by Colleen M. Gary: an inflation‑estimate petition to the Committee on Children, Families, and Persons with Disabilities; a cash‑acceptance petition; and an alcohol‑by‑volume labeling petition to the Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.
Get email alerts on the Petitions Joint Rule 12 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Massachusetts House suspended Joint Rule 12 on the recommendation of the Committee on Rules and referred three petitions filed by Colleen M. Gary, including measures on inflation estimates for social service programs, a proposed cash‑acceptance requirement for establishments, and a requirement to list alcohol‑by‑volume for beers on menus.
On the House floor the Committee on Rules reported and recommended suspension of Joint Rule 12 to allow consideration of the petitions. The clerk read the committee report placing the petition “relative to the estimated rate of inflation for social service programs” with the Committee on Children, Families, and Persons with Disabilities. A separate petition from Colleen M. Gary proposing that all establishments be required to accept cash for transactions was filed; the transcript lists that petition but does not record a specific committee placement for it on the floor record excerpt. A third petition, relative to listing alcohol by volume for beer sections on menus, was sent to the Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.
Representative Connolly of Cambridge moved the suspension of rules; the House adopted the motion by voice vote and the transcript records “the ayes have it” and that Joint Rule 12 was suspended. The suspension enabled the committee referrals recorded on the floor; the transcript does not include committee debate or votes on the petitions themselves.
Actions taken on the floor were procedural: the House suspended a rule to permit consideration and referred the named petitions to committees for review. The transcript does not show further committee action, nor does it record any detailed debate on the petitions’ substantive merits during the floor proceeding.
