Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parade Firearms topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel approves clarification allowing spectators to carry concealed weapons at parades; opponents warn of safety and insurance impacts
Summary
The committee reported House Bill 393 favorably after its author said the bill simply clarifies that the statute bars concealed weapons only for active parade participants and not for spectators; opponents urged defeat, citing alcohol, crowd safety and insurance concerns.
Get email alerts on the Parade Firearms topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Bamberg presented House Bill 393, describing it as a technical clarification to Louisiana law on concealed carry at parades. He said the existing statute prohibits carrying a concealed handgun if you are a participant in a parade for which a permit is issued, but does not prohibit a bystander or spectator from carrying.
Supporters including the Louisiana Shooting Association and the National Rifle Association testified the bill restores the long‑standing interpretation taught to permit holders and trainers for decades. Dan Zelenka (Louisiana Shooting Association) said the measure “is simply to allow bystanders or spectators to carry at a parade or demonstration.” Kelby Senior (NRA) said the bill “is not changing anything. This is simply to allow bystanders or spectators to carry at a parade or demonstration.”
Opponents argued the change would invite firearms into crowded, alcohol‑tinged events. Megan Makita of Moms Demand Action testified, “In a crowded public space where lots of alcohol is present, we just can't be taking risks. Alcohol and firearms do not mix.” Parade performers and community members told senators they feared accidental or intentional shootings, a stampede, or higher insurance costs that could threaten local cultural events. Several witnesses urged localities be allowed to opt out and raised worries about the effect of a federal “into” versus state “in” distinction cited in recent court opinions.
Senators debated training and public education for permitless or constitutional carry and whether online resources and optional classes are sufficient. Senator Barrow expressed strong concern about the implications for family parades and insurance costs for event organizers. The committee recorded a roll call and HB 393 was reported favorably.
