Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Debris Removal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mobile City seeks three-year debris-removal contract with Crowder Gulf
Summary
City staff asked the council to approve a contingency contract with Crowder Gulf for post-disaster debris removal, replacing the current DRC arrangement; council members raised questions about public notice, contract review and potential mobilization costs and reimbursement procedures.
Mobile City officials asked the council to approve a contingency contract with Crowder Gulf to provide post-disaster debris removal services, saying the agreement would be called only if the city needs contractor assistance after a storm.
City staff and council members said the contract would replace the current DRC arrangement and would be structured with unit prices and mobilization terms. Sam, City staff, told the council, “this is a debris removal contract, so there's really no money involved unless we call upon the company.”
The request was presented as a consent-item pull for the council to consider immediately rather than waiting for the normal procurement calendar. Councilman Carroll asked, “Don't we normally have, a contract in in place?” and Councilman Reynolds said he did not “understand the public necessity to take this out of our ordinary course of business,” urging more time for the public and council to review the change in contractor.
City staff said Crowder Gulf was the low-cost, locally based award on the recent solicitation and that the company’s local equipment and faster mobilization would reduce potential disaster mobilization costs and help the city document state and federal reimbursement. Sam said, “And that mobilization is substantially less because they're locally based, and they own their equipment. Their trucks are here. That makes a huge difference.”
Staff described the contract as a multi-year award with renewal options. Council members expressed two recurring concerns during discussion: (1) short turnaround from posting to seeking council action and (2) the financial risk of a one-time mobilization if a storm occurs before the contract is in place. Councilman Carroll warned such a call-out could “be, a a huge loss to the city on a 1 time mobilization” if unit costs and mobilization terms were not favorable.
The transcript records that the administration asked for consent to take the item up the same day and that no formal objection was recorded to proceeding. The meeting record included questions from council members asking for more time to read the contract; no vote tally or formal motion approving the Crowder Gulf agreement is recorded in the transcript provided.
What happened next: staff said the item was being advanced out of caution after recent storm damage and to position the city for faster mobilization and reimbursement should another event occur. No formal motion language, mover/second or roll-call vote appears in the transcript excerpt.
