Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance Policy Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses pushing for earlier intervention on chronic absenteeism in upcoming legislative asks
Summary
Board members debated adding language to the district’s legislative priorities to allow the district to act before the current 90-day/10-absence threshold, proposing a shorter window (for example, 45 days) and earlier outreach to families.
At the superintendent’s workshop, board members and staff discussed including an attendance-related legislative request in the district’s platform that would allow earlier intervention when students accrue unexcused or unknown absences.
Staff described the current statutory framework (the 90-calendar-day period tied to 10 unexcused absences) as a barrier to early intervention; under current practice, certain enforcement or referral steps do not occur until the 90-day threshold is met. Board members argued the district sees problematic absenteeism well before that milestone and requested language that would permit the district to initiate family contact and interventions sooner.
Board discussion focused on what to propose: whether to shorten the 90-day calendar period (staff and members suggested 45 days as an operationally meaningful option) and whether to adjust the numeric threshold (for example, lowering 10 absences to 5). Members also asked whether the threshold refers to consecutive absences or cumulative absences across the year and whether “unknown” reasons should be treated differently from unexcused absences. Several board members recommended the platform reference the exact bill language if the change came from a prior bill (Senate Bill 166 was cited during the workshop as having related language that failed to pass) or be tied to a train bill if the language is reintroduced.
Staff and board members agreed to monitor the legislature (including a possible placement of the language in a train bill such as the referenced 11O5) and to refine the platform language. Several board members suggested adding parent-facing language explaining earlier outreach and urging staff to return with a clearer, shorter phrasing (for example: permit earlier outreach—e.g., within 45 days—or similar clear numeric language) before the board votes at the business meeting.
No formal vote was taken during the workshop; staff will bring revised platform language to the board for the June business meeting and will coordinate with the district’s lobbyists.
