Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Codes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County attorney and staff outline building‑code and property‑maintenance ordinance updates, including heat, quality control and permit timing

3628969 · June 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff and the county attorney presented draft updates to the building and property‑maintenance ordinance, adding specific heating dates and minimum temperatures, treating workmanship quality as enforceable, and proposing clarified permit‑response times and annual fee reviews.

Spalding County staff and the county attorney reviewed proposed updates to the county’s building and property‑maintenance ordinance, explaining changes to adopt updated international codes, add required heating‑season dates, bring quality control of materials and workmanship under the code’s purview, and refine permit timing and fee‑review procedures.

The county attorney noted the update adopts state‑level building code changes and required appendix language and said the property‑maintenance article must specify dates for the minimum heat standard. The ordinance language states landlords or operators of rental units must provide heat to occupants during a defined period (the draft specifies October–March) and maintain minimum indoor temperatures (the draft references 68 degrees Fahrenheit for dwelling units and 65 degrees for occupiable workspaces during specified dates).

Staff and commissioners discussed several enforcement and capacity issues. Commissioners asked whether the county can enforce things such as insulation R‑values, installation quality and staged inspections; staff and code enforcement said those items are addressed through the international codes and that the county can and should enforce material and workmanship quality but noted the county currently has limited inspector capacity (described in the workshop as about “one and a half” inspectors) and that more staffing would be required for more rigorous in‑progress inspections.

Other topics covered included: - Permit timing and response: staff and the board discussed adding an initial response time to permit applications (the draft currently requires action “without unreasonable or unnecessary delay”); staff suggested adding a defined initial response window and tracking with permit software so applicants receive timely deficiency notices. - Fee review cadence: staff recommended aligning fee schedule reviews with the budget process; the code language will be revised to reflect annual review timing rather than open‑ended ‘from time to time’ language. - Exterior property and nuisance rules: the draft reintroduces property‑maintenance language to address trash, high grass, rodent harborage, screening for habitable windows and related exterior items; staff said the revision restores language that had been removed in earlier code versions. - Zoning board of appeals: staff discussed a separate planning‑law change under development to remove the Board of Zoning Appeals and transfer appeals responsibility to the board of commissioners; staff advised retaining the zoning board for pending advertised matters through July and then implementing deletion after that timetable to avoid disrupting currently advertised applications.

Next steps: This draft will be presented for first reading at the evening meeting and staff said they will return with a cleaned, revised text for second reading, incorporate agreed edits (for example, replacing phrasing 'not'/'accept' with 'include' where needed), and add clarifying permit response time language and fee‑review cadence. Staff cautioned that more extensive enforcement of workmanship and inspection requirements will require additional inspector capacity to be effective.