Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies request to allow cannabis micro/mezzo businesses in agricultural districts
Summary
Goodhue County commissioners rejected a proposed zoning amendment that would have permitted combined cannabis cultivation and manufacturing uses (micro/mezzo businesses) in agricultural districts, following Planning Commission recommendation to deny and concerns about wastewater, waste disposal and enforcement in rural areas.
The Goodhue County Board voted May 20 to deny a petition to amend the county zoning ordinance to allow certain cannabis micro and mezzo business license types in agricultural zoning districts.
Land Use staff summarized an application submitted by a county landowner seeking changes that would permit combined cannabis cultivation and manufacturing (so‑called micro or mezzo businesses) in A‑1, A‑2 and A‑3 agricultural districts and to add related uses to business districts. Staff recommended denying the change, and the Planning Advisory Commission agreed.
Staff briefed the board on state licensing: Minnesota will issue multiple cannabis license types with mixed operations possible under micro and mezzo classifications. The county currently permits cultivation in agricultural districts but restricts micro/mezzo and manufacturing activities to business and industrial districts, a distinction staff and the Planning Commission said should remain given concerns about wastewater handling, waste disposal, nuisance control and enforcement in rural areas without municipal infrastructure or regular police presence.
Commissioners discussed analogies to farm wineries and noted that processing agricultural products (for example, converting grapes to wine) is handled differently by local ordinances. After discussion the Board approved a motion to deny the requested zoning amendments.
Staff noted continuing uncertainty because the state has not yet issued retail or production licenses; counties and cities around Minnesota are continuing to weigh land‑use and regulatory approaches as state licensing develops.
